Skip to main content

Pears in Charts: Recent pricing pushed below previous years’ levels

Taking a look at the pear markets, the first thing that struck me when I began researching this dataset is that the market appears to be in decline, which I haven't found to be very common among the different commodities we work with. From the available data it seems that 2015 was pears’ best year, after which volumes began to decrease, dropping by almost one fourth since their high point of 2012.

Initially, the drop in volume coincided with increases in pricing, but that trend has since tapered off, seeing both a drop in price and volume over the last two years. This tells me that the demand for pears is waning. At the same, time other fruits are seeing growth, so it appears that consumers are choosing to spend their dollars on other products, which has been eating into pears’ market share within the produce aisle. I don’t have any objective data on what products are taking market share from pears, but any comments or opinions on the subject would be more than welcome.

Pear Non Organic Prices and Volumes

(Source: USDA Market News via Agronometrics)
[Agronometrics users can view this chart with live updates here]

Digging a bit deeper we can appreciate the different seasons and the roles of each of the origins in the market. My focus in this article will be on Chile and Argentina, whose season is about to begin and whose exporters and their counterparts may be looking at the same data to put together their programs for the upcoming season.

Chile and Argentina roughly share the same commercial window, with Argentina far and away the largest producer in the Southern Hemisphere, sending about twice the volume Chile sends on any given year. Starting after Washington and Oregon's peak in production, they prop up supply from February to July before Northern California gets going.

Pear Non Organic Volumes by Origin

(Source: USDA Market News via Agronometrics)
[Agronometrics users can view this chart with live updates here]

The pricing that both Chile and Argentina enjoy is typically higher than Washington’s, with Argentina historically receiving a 10% premium on Chile’s prices. Last year was a rare exception in which Chile’s prices were equivalent to or higher than Argentina’s.

Pear Non-Organic Prices per Kilo by Origin

(Source: USDA Market News via Agronometrics)
[Agronometrics users can view this chart with live updates here]

Coming in after four months of low prices, I wanted to better understand where the market is now to get a better idea of where we are going. Prices from October to January were 14% lower year-on-year. This drop has come hand in hand with a rise in volume, but only 11% year-on-year.

Historic Pear Non-Organic Prices

(Source: USDA Market News via Agronometrics)
[Agronometrics users can view this chart with live updates here]

Like with most commodities, you can see that there are high volumes matching up with the low pricing of the last three months, however, October is a bit of an enigma. Looking back another two years and a trend began to form, where October has been consistently underperforming previous years with a consistent miss-match between pricing and volumes compared to the nearly all other time periods of the year. This may be something to consider producers in Oregon and Washington, where the month corresponds with the peak of production.

Looking forward, everything I can find in the data indicates that the next couple of months shouldn't hold any big surprises, where changes in volume compared to last year should be proportional to changes in pricing compared to last year. The only exception might well be April, which has also seen big changes in volume without reflecting changes in pricing.

With a 4% year-on-year increase in production forecast for both Chile and Argentina season (Mixed picture for Southern Hemisphere pome fruit production), I would expect prices to come up a bit over the next couple of weeks, but as long as Oregon and especially Washington continue to deliver the large volumes we have been seeing. The pricing we have seen from Chile last week already seems to be an improvement on last year, coming in at $0.54 higher for 18 kg cartons tray pack.

Historic Pear Non-Organic Volumes

(Source: USDA Market News via Agronometrics)
[Agronometrics users can view this chart with live updates here]

As a useful tool for readers to gauge how the markets are currently evolving, we offer weekly pricing by fruit size.

Pears, Summer Bartlett, Non Organic, Prices by Size

(Source: USDA Market News via Agronometrics)
[Agronometrics users can view this chart with live updates here]

Pears, Summer Bartlett, Non-Organic, Prices by Size (Week 8)

Sizes Price Reported
Average $31.76
70 sz $35.00
80 sz $35.00
90 sz $31.00
100 sz $27.75
110 sz $25.00

Written by: Colin Fain
Original published in on February 26, 2019 (Link)


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Apples in Charts: Honeycrisp, the queen of the U.S. market

Apples are a high-volume fruit commodity which growers need to produce very efficiently in order to be profitable, and the U.S. is no exception to this rule.

Apples from numerous origins are sold in the U.S. market, which is supplied principally by fruit from Washington State, as can be seen in the chart below.

Average historic arrival volumes of apples in the U.S. market, by origin

Source: USDA Market News via Agronometrics. (Agronometrics users can
view this chart with live updates here)
Average historic apple prices in the U.S. market have oscillated between around US$1.00 and US$1.75 per kilo over the last decade.

Historic weekly prices (USD/KG) of apples in the U.S. market

(Source: USDA Market News via Agronometrics. (Agronometrics users can
view this chart with live updates here)
But in the panorama of apples in the U.S., there is one variety that has stood out from the others – Honeycrisp. This queen of the U.S. apple market has great growth potential and excellent prospects…

Fruit in Charts: The winners and losers of 2018 (Part 3 of 3)

This article is the culmination of two previous posts that explored which commodities grew the most and the least through prices and volumes in both 2018 and over the last eight years. You can catch up on those previous articles with the following links:
The Winners and Losers of 2018 (Part 1 of 3)
The Winners and Losers of 2018 (Part 2 of 3)

In the process of writing the previous two articles, we saw that many of the commodities that had the highest prices also had the lowest volumes, and vice-versa. This begs the question, where are the best opportunities in this industry, where is growth and how do we define it? So in this article we will look at creating an index that combines the two factors and see if it can shed some light on this.

One of the most contentious commodities of 2018 was avocados, which saw the biggest drop in average yearly price compared with all other commodities we track. Avocados also saw one of the largest increases in volume of any commodity that we track. In …

Fruit in Charts: The winners and losers of 2018 (Part 2 of 3)

Here is part two of three looking at the winners and losers of 2018. The previous article was based on pricing information made available by the USDA market data, and here we will look at the volume data.

The USDA’s volume data is one of the most complete representations of a market available everywhere – not only considering imports to the U.S., but national production to a large extent as well. In 2018 we also saw a big improvement to the data set, which now offers more complete information for several commodities (mostly citrus), which used to only partially include U.S. production. Average Yearly Volumes by Commodity (Source: USDA Market News via Agronometrics)
[Agronometrics users can view this chart with live updates here
In the table below we can see the ranking of commodities by percentage of growth, which offers some good insights when considering the commercialization of the fruit the data set is trying to represent. By far the biggest increase in volume is for lemons and or…