Skip to main content

Fruit in Charts: The winners and losers of 2018 (Part 3 of 3)

This article is the culmination of two previous posts that explored which commodities grew the most and the least through prices and volumes in both 2018 and over the last eight years. You can catch up on those previous articles with the following links:
The Winners and Losers of 2018 (Part 1 of 3)
The Winners and Losers of 2018 (Part 2 of 3)

In the process of writing the previous two articles, we saw that many of the commodities that had the highest prices also had the lowest volumes, and vice-versa. This begs the question, where are the best opportunities in this industry, where is growth and how do we define it? So in this article we will look at creating an index that combines the two factors and see if it can shed some light on this.

One of the most contentious commodities of 2018 was avocados, which saw the biggest drop in average yearly price compared with all other commodities we track. Avocados also saw one of the largest increases in volume of any commodity that we track. In the graph below we set the average yearly growth of price and volume of avocados against each other to help illustrate what we are seeing in the market.
Avocado Prices and Volumes
(Source: USDA Market News via Agronometrics)
[Agronometrics users can view this chart with live updates here

To best represent the evolution of the relationship between these two lines, we need to consider a third parameter – one that takes into consideration both price and volume. The solution is more simple than one might guess, because by simply multiplying the two you get a line that evens out the variance between price and volume – in effect isolating only growth. From there we can calculate percentages in a similar method to what we had done with the prices and the volumes. The table below show what this looks like with the data from the above chart.

Avocado Yearly Percentage Growth

Year Price per Kilo (USD) Volumes (KG) Combination† Category Growth
2010 $2.18 620,112,024 1,350,410,929
2011 $3.07 559,783,224 1,716,464,951 127%
2012 $2.01 713,934,648 1,436,698,780 84%
2013 $2.24 819,133,560 1,838,842,835 128%
2014 $2.43 853,870,248 2,073,325,346 113%
2015 $2.42 1,010,366,784 2,448,549,482 118%
2016 $2.60 1,059,845,472 2,755,413,703 113%
2017 $3.60 988,770,888 3,558,808,291 129%
2018 $2.59 1,145,893,392 2,971,848,420 84%

The data we are using this method is not perfect, but it is the best method I have found with which to understand how markets are growing and compare commodities. Given that shipping point prices exaggerate high prices – mostly because they only capture the spot market which has to respond to deficits left by programs – the values when prices are high will be higher than they should be, but otherwise I believe this method to be representative of category growth.
Applying this to our entire dataset, we can then begin to formulate our best of 2018 with a bit more depth. As discussed in the previous article, the data for lemons and oranges are unfortunately distorted by new data that simply wasn’t being reported before. It doesn’t mean that they haven’t seen impressive growth in their own right, but it is hard to compare them to the other commodities. Setting those aside, the top commodities in the industry according to this ranking are limes, avocados and asparagus. These commodities in particular do a very good job demonstrating how growth can be split between price and volume, and looking at both together can be a useful tool to study the long term evolution of a commodity.

On the other hand, plums, nectarines and grapefruit all show increases in pricing but have demonstrated the least amount of growth given their decreasing volumes.

So this is the best of 2018. I look forward to highlighting some of the most intriguing stories in the market during 2019 and circling around next year to look at how each commodity has grown and evolved in a similar report for 2019.

In bold, the commodity “All” represents the average growth for all the products we have in Agronometrics, so commodities above this line should be more attractive than the ones below. To read this chart, keep in mind that 100% equals the same volume as last year, where anything above is growth and anything below is a loss.

 Yearly Percentage Growth by Commodity
Rank Commodity Growth in Prices 8 Year Ave 2018 Growth in Volumes 8 Year Ave 2018 Commodity Growth 8 Year Ave 2018
1 Lemons* 108.90% 148.03% 158.74%
2 Oranges* 107.03% 129.05% 137.21%
3 Limes 106.27% 105.71% 109.93%
4 Avocados 100.42% 111.27% 109.68%
5 Asparagus 101.85% 108.11% 109.48%
6 Cherries 104.41% 105.21% 108.69%
7 Kiwifruit* 105.06% 104.09% 106.58%
8 Strawberries 102.96% 103.62% 106.36%
9 Blackberries 97.79% 107.01% 104.70%
10 Apples 102.52% 102.19% 104.65%
11 Blueberries 100.68% 103.25% 103.69%
12 Mangoes 100.86% 104.10% 103.57%
13 All* 100.69% 102.45% 103.08%
14 Raspberries 97.18% 105.93% 102.40%
15 Grapes 101.20% 100.37% 101.66%
16 Clementines 99.40% 100.15% 100.45%
17 Pears 102.16% 97.81% 99.92%
18 Peaches 106.78% 95.20% 99.61%
19 Grapefruit* 103.74% 92.12% 95.24%
20 Nectarines 107.05% 90.42% 95.12%
21 Plums 107.64% 82.18% 85.78%

† Commodity growth is not a figure with which to quantify the value of the market as Shipping Point prices only represent a percentage of the volume being commercialized, it should only be used as an abstract tool with which to look at growth.

The (*) has been included to next to mark fruit that as of 2018 and partially in 2017 included fruit volumes that were prior to not recorded, which could distort growth statistics. You can see more about this in the previous article The Winners and Losers of 2018 (Part 2 of 3).

Written by: Colin Fain

Original published in on January 29, 2019 (Link)


Popular posts from this blog

The table grape industry is in uncharted territory right now

Overview of the potential impact of COVID-19 on future grape supply and price, by Ira Greenstein of Direct Source Marketing, complemented by charts from Agronometrics.

Original published in on March 24, 2020

While the Chilean and Peruvian grape seasons are winding down and their weekly volumes are decreasing, the table grape industry has seen an uptick in demand in the past weeks. This is partially a result of the high retail movements due to the coronavirus panic-shopping of the past few weeks. Ira Greenstein of Direct Source Marketing says: “A month ago, importers had a real concern that the industry wouldn’t be able to move through the condensed volumes and huge inventories would be sitting in cold storages. That sentiment has completely reversed with substantially increased retail demand due to the COVID-19 pandemic.”

With the lower volumes but increasing demand, the cold stores are rapidly being depleted and spot market pricing is expected to continue to increase, …

Avocados In Charts - Prices are falling and why are they likely to settle below 2018

Agronometrics has often spoken about what is to come and how the market could be affected. We hold a strong belief in being able to look at objective data can help navigate complicated scenarios. The recent spike in prices that avocados have seen is an example of one of these scenarios, catching many by surprise at a time of the year where we had never seen movements like this before. This can be seen in the chart below where the 2019 line has towered above all other prices since Sept. 2017 and every price recorded for June in the last five years.

Historic Hass Avocado Prices

Source: USDA Market News via Agronometrics. (Agronometrics users can
view this chart with live updates here)
Comparing the volumes of this year to the last can offer some insight as to how these prices have come about. Considering the prices were almost flat last year, the volume data serves as a great benchmark to understand where customers expectations lie.

In this year’s data, an important oversupply can be …

Blueberry boom: Worldwide growth creates challenges for NW producers

Overview of the northwest blueberry season by Doug Krahmer of Berries Northwest, Cort Brazelton of Fall Creek Farm and Nursery, Kasey Cronquist of the U.S. Highbush Blueberry Council and Mark Hurst of Hurst's Berry Farm, complemented by charts from Agronometrics.

Original published in on July 30, 2020

ALBANY, Ore. — On a seasonably warm July afternoon in the fertile Willamette Valley, Doug Krahmer stood between rows of organic blueberries and watched as a large mechanical harvester rolled slowly through the field, rattling bushes heavy with ripe fruit.

Measuring a little more than 15 feet tall, 11 feet wide and weighing 7 tons, the harvester seemingly floated in the distance over neat rows while fiberglass rods, or “fingers,” shook the berries onto a conveyor belt that swooped them to the upper deck and into plastic crates.

From there, the crates were loaded into refrigerated trucks and driven from the farm north of Albany, Ore., to a packing shed east of Po…